Reconciliation on healthcare reform…that has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? Everyone in government will get together and seek out a consensus on what is best for the country and then “get-er-done” (that’s a new legislative phrase that has gained favor as more and more comedians join the senate).
Ah, if only it were so. As with so many things in Washington, “reconciliation” doesn’t mean what it means. Reconciliation is a parliamentary procedure that a dominant party can use to prevent the other party from blocking legislation in the Senate. Invoking reconciliation would allow Senate Democrats to pass a health- care bill with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed to overcome stalling tactics.
Bottom line, the Democrats are going to cram healthcare reform through with or without the support of Republicans and, if necessary, without the support of all of their own troops.
Obama May Rely on Partisan Vote For Health-care Bill
Bloomberg
President Barack Obama may rely only on Democrats to push health-care legislation through the U.S. Congress if Republican resistance doesn’t eventually give way, two of the president’s top advisers said.
“Ultimately, this is not about a process, it’s about results,” David Axelrod, Obama’s senior political strategist, said during an interview yesterday in his White House office. “If we’re going to get this thing done, obviously time is a- wasting.”
Both Axelrod and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said taking a partisan route to enacting major health-care legislation isn’t the president’s preferred choice. Yet in separate interviews, each man left that option open. “We’d like to do it with the votes of members of both parties,” Axelrod said. “But the worst result would be to not get health-care reform done.”

